This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.2.0: STU 3 Draft). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R4B R4 R3 R2
Definition for Value SetConceptMapEquivalence
<ValueSet xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <id value="concept-map-equivalence"/> <meta> <lastUpdated value="2015-12-11T17:38:40.294+11:00"/> <profile value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-shareable-definition"/> </meta> <text> <status value="generated"/> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <h2>ConceptMapEquivalence</h2> <p>The degree of equivalence between concepts.</p> <p>This value set has an inline code system http://hl7.org/fhir/concept-map-equivalence, which defines the following codes:</p> <table class="codes"> <tr> <td> <b>Lvl</b> </td> <td> <b>Code</b> </td> <td> <b>Display</b> </td> <td> <b>Definition</b> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>equivalent <a name="equivalent"> </a> </td> <td>Equivalent</td> <td>The definitions of the concepts mean the same thing (including when structural implications of meaning are considered) (i.e. extensionally identical).</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2</td> <td> equal <a name="equal"> </a> </td> <td>Equal</td> <td>The definitions of the concepts are exactly the same (i.e. only grammatical differences) and structural implications of meaning are identical or irrelevant (i.e. intentionally identical).</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>wider <a name="wider"> </a> </td> <td>Wider</td> <td>The target mapping is wider in meaning than the source concept.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>subsumes <a name="subsumes"> </a> </td> <td>Subsumes</td> <td>The target mapping subsumes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the source is-a target).</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>narrower <a name="narrower"> </a> </td> <td>Narrower</td> <td>The target mapping is narrower in meaning that the source concept. The sense in which the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>specializes <a name="specializes"> </a> </td> <td>Specializes</td> <td>The target mapping specializes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the target is-a source).</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>inexact <a name="inexact"> </a> </td> <td>Inexact</td> <td>The target mapping overlaps with the source concept, but both source and target cover additional meaning, or the definitions are imprecise and it is uncertain whether they have the same boundaries to their meaning. The sense in which the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>unmatched <a name="unmatched"> </a> </td> <td>Unmatched</td> <td>There is no match for this concept in the destination concept system.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2</td> <td> disjoint <a name="disjoint"> </a> </td> <td>Disjoint</td> <td>This is an explicit assertion that there is no mapping between the source and target concept.</td> </tr> </table> </div> </text> <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-oid"> <valueUri value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.2.9"/> </extension> <url value="http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/concept-map-equivalence"/> <version value="1.2.0"/> <name value="ConceptMapEquivalence"/> <status value="draft"/> <experimental value="false"/> <publisher value="HL7 (FHIR Project)"/> <contact> <telecom> <system value="other"/> <value value="http://hl7.org/fhir"/> </telecom> <telecom> <system value="email"/> <value value="fhir@lists.hl7.org"/> </telecom> </contact> <date value="2015-12-11T17:38:40+11:00"/> <description value="The degree of equivalence between concepts."/> <codeSystem> <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-oid"> <valueUri value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.4.642.1.9"/> </extension> <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/concept-map-equivalence"/> <version value="1.2.0"/> <caseSensitive value="true"/> <concept> <code value="equivalent"/> <display value="Equivalent"/> <definition value="The definitions of the concepts mean the same thing (including when structural implications of meaning are considered) (i.e. extensionally identical)."/> <concept> <code value="equal"/> <display value="Equal"/> <definition value="The definitions of the concepts are exactly the same (i.e. only grammatical differences) and structural implications of meaning are identical or irrelevant (i.e. intentionally identical)."/> </concept> </concept> <concept> <code value="wider"/> <display value="Wider"/> <definition value="The target mapping is wider in meaning than the source concept."/> </concept> <concept> <code value="subsumes"/> <display value="Subsumes"/> <definition value="The target mapping subsumes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the source is-a target)."/> </concept> <concept> <code value="narrower"/> <display value="Narrower"/> <definition value="The target mapping is narrower in meaning that the source concept. The sense in which the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally."/> </concept> <concept> <code value="specializes"/> <display value="Specializes"/> <definition value="The target mapping specializes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the target is-a source)."/> </concept> <concept> <code value="inexact"/> <display value="Inexact"/> <definition value="The target mapping overlaps with the source concept, but both source and target cover additional meaning, or the definitions are imprecise and it is uncertain whether they have the same boundaries to their meaning. The sense in which the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally."/> </concept> <concept> <code value="unmatched"/> <display value="Unmatched"/> <definition value="There is no match for this concept in the destination concept system."/> <concept> <code value="disjoint"/> <display value="Disjoint"/> <definition value="This is an explicit assertion that there is no mapping between the source and target concept."/> </concept> </concept> </codeSystem> </ValueSet>
Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.