Extension: Is associated Provenance needed?

Connectathon 11 Snapshot

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v1.2.0: STU 3 Draft). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions

Extension Is associated Provenance needed? - Detailed Descriptions

Detailed Descriptions for the elements in the extension.

Extension
Definition	If true, indicates that QuestionnaireResponse instances created against this questionnaire must have an associated Provenance record.
Control	0..1
Type	Extension
Comments	Systems may choose to require that the QuestionnaireResponse and referencing Provenance instance be submitted together as a single transaction using Bundle.
Extension.id
Definition	unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references).
Control	0..1
Type	id
Extension.extension(extension)
Definition	An Extension
Control	0..0
Type	Extension
Extension.url
Definition	Source of the definition for the extension code - a logical name or a URL.
Control	1..1
Type	uri
Comments	The definition may point directly to a computable or human-readable definition of the extensibility codes, or it may be a logical URI as declared in some other specification. The definition should be version specific. This will ideally be the URI for the Resource Profile defining the extension, with the code for the extension after a #.
Fixed Value	http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-provenanceSignatureRequred
Extension.valueBoolean
Definition	Value of extension - may be a resource or one of a constrained set of the data types (see Extensibility in the spec for list).
Control	1..1
Type	boolean