DSTU2 Ballot Source

This page is part of the FHIR Specification (v0.5.0: DSTU 2 Ballot 2). The current version which supercedes this version is 5.0.0. For a full list of available versions, see the Directory of published versions . Page versions: R4 R3 R2

V3-ObservationInterpretation.xml

Raw XML (canonical form)

One or more codes specifying a rough qualitative interpretation of the observation, such as "normal", "abnormal", "below normal", "change up", "resistant", "susceptible", etc. OpenIssue: Description copied from Concept Domain of same name. Must be verified. Note also that this might be identical to the V2 code system of interpretation codes (formerly Abnormal Flags in older versions).

Raw XML

<ValueSet xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir">
  <id value="v3-ObservationInterpretation"/>
  <meta>
    <lastUpdated value="2015-03-23T00:00:00.000+11:00"/>
    <profile value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-shareable-definition"/>
  </meta>
  <text>
    <status value="generated"/>
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><!-- Snipped for brevity --></div>
  </text>
  <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-oid">
    <valueUri value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.78"/>
  </extension>
  <url value="http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/vs/ObservationInterpretation"/>
  <version value="2015-03-23"/>
  <name value="v3 Code System ObservationInterpretation"/>
  <publisher value="HL7, Inc"/>
  <contact>
    <telecom>
      <system value="url"/>
      <value value="http://hl7.org"/>
    </telecom>
  </contact>
  <description value=" One or more codes specifying a rough qualitative interpretation of the observation, such
     as &quot;normal&quot;, &quot;abnormal&quot;, &quot;below normal&quot;, &quot;change up&quot;,
     &quot;resistant&quot;, &quot;susceptible&quot;, etc.  OpenIssue: Description copied from
     Concept Domain of same name.  Must be verified.  Note also that this might be identical
     to the V2 code system of interpretation codes (formerly Abnormal Flags in older versions)."/>
  <status value="active"/>
  <experimental value="false"/>
  <date value="2015-03-23"/>
  <define>
    <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-oid">
      <valueUri value="urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.5.83"/>
    </extension>
    <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ObservationInterpretation"/>
    <caseSensitive value="true"/>
    <concept>
      <code value="_GeneticObservationInterpretation"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="GeneticObservationInterpretation"/>
      <definition value="Codes that specify interpretation of genetic analysis, such as &quot;positive&quot;, &quot;negative&
        quot;, &quot;carrier&quot;, &quot;responsive&quot;, etc."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="CAR"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Carrier"/>
        <definition value="The patient is considered as carrier based on the testing results. A carrier is an individual
           who carries an altered form of a gene which can lead to having a child or offspring in
           future generations with a genetic disorder."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-deprecated">
          <valueBoolean value="true"/>
        </extension>
        <code value="Carrier"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Carrier"/>
        <definition value="The patient is considered as carrier based on the testing results. A carrier is an individual
           who carries an altered form of a gene which can lead to having a child or offspring in
           future generations with a genetic disorder.                                          
                                                     Deprecation Comment:                       
                This code is currently the same string as the print name for this concept and is
           inconsistent with the conventions being used for the other codes in the coding system,
           as it is a full word with initial capitalization, rather than an all upper case mnemonic.
            The recommendation from OO is to deprecate the code &quot;Carrier&quot; and to add &quot;CAR&quot;
           as the new active code representation for this concept."/>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <code value="_ObservationInterpretationChange"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="ObservationInterpretationChange"/>
      <definition value="Interpretations of change of quantity and/or severity. At most one of B or W and one of
         U or D allowed."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="B"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Better"/>
        <definition value="The current result or observation value has improved compared to the previous result or
           observation value (the change is significant as defined in the respective test procedure).
                                    [Note: This can be applied to quantitative or qualitative observations.]"/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="D"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Significant change down"/>
        <definition value="The current result has decreased from the previous result for a quantitative observation
           (the change is significant as defined in the respective test procedure)."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="U"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Significant change up"/>
        <definition value="The current result has increased from the previous result for a quantitative observation
           (the change is significant as defined in the respective test procedure)."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="W"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Worse"/>
        <definition value="The current result or observation value has degraded compared to the previous result or
           observation value (the change is significant as defined in the respective test procedure).
                                    [Note: This can be applied to quantitative or qualitative observations.]"/>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <code value="_ObservationInterpretationExceptions"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="ObservationInterpretationExceptions"/>
      <definition value="Technical exceptions resulting in the inability to provide an interpretation. At most
         one allowed. Does not imply normality or severity."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="&lt;"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Off scale low"/>
        <definition value="The result is below the minimum detection limit (the test procedure or equipment is the
           limiting factor).                          Synonyms: Below analytical limit, low off scale."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="&gt;"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Off scale high"/>
        <definition value="The result is above the maximum quantifiable limit (the test procedure or equipment is
           the limiting factor).                          Synonyms: Above analytical limit, high
           off scale."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="AC"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Anti-complementary substances present"/>
        <definition value="A valid result cannot be obtained for the specified component / analyte due to the presence
           of anti-complementary substances in the sample."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="IE"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Insufficient evidence"/>
        <definition value="There is insufficient evidence that the species in question is a good target for therapy
           with the drug.  A categorical interpretation is not possible.                        
            [Note: A MIC with &quot;IE&quot; and/or a comment may be reported (without an accompanying
           S, I or R-categorization).]"/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="QCF"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Quality control failure"/>
        <definition value="A result cannot be considered valid for the specified component / analyte or organism
           due to failure in the quality control testing component."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="TOX"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Cytotoxic substance present"/>
        <definition value="A valid result cannot be obtained for the specified organism or cell line due to the presence
           of cytotoxic substances in the sample or culture."/>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <code value="_ObservationInterpretationNormality"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="ObservationInterpretationNormality"/>
      <definition value="Interpretation of normality or degree of abnormality (including critical or &quot;alert&quot;
         level). Concepts in this category are mutually exclusive, i.e., at most one is allowed."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="A"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Abnormal"/>
        <definition value="The result or observation value is outside the reference range or expected norm (as defined
           for the respective test procedure).                          [Note: Typically applies
           to non-numeric results.]"/>
        <concept>
          <code value="AA"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Critically abnormal"/>
          <definition value="The result or observation value is outside a reference range or expected norm at a level
             at which immediate action should be considered for patient safety (as defined for the
             respective test procedure).                          [Note: Typically applies to non-numeric
             results.  Analogous to critical/panic limits for numeric results.]"/>
          <concept>
            <code value="HH"/>
            <abstract value="false"/>
            <display value="Critically high"/>
            <definition value="The result for a quantitative observation is above a reference level at which immediate
               action should be considered for patient safety (as defined for the respective test procedure).
                                        Synonym: Above upper panic limits."/>
          </concept>
          <concept>
            <code value="LL"/>
            <abstract value="false"/>
            <display value="Critically low"/>
            <definition value="The result for a quantitative observation is below a reference level at which immediate
               action should be considered for patient safety (as defined for the respective test procedure).
                                        Synonym: Below lower panic limits."/>
          </concept>
        </concept>
        <concept>
          <code value="H"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="High"/>
          <definition value="The result for a quantitative observation is above the upper limit of the reference range
             (as defined for the respective test procedure).                          Synonym: Above
             high normal"/>
          <concept>
            <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-deprecated">
              <valueBoolean value="true"/>
            </extension>
            <modifierExtension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-subsumes">
              <valueCode value="HH"/>
            </modifierExtension>
            <code value="H&gt;"/>
            <abstract value="false"/>
            <display value="Significantly high"/>
            <definition value="A test result that is significantly higher than the reference (normal) or therapeutic
               interval, but has not reached the critically high value and might need special attention,
               as defined by the laboratory or the clinician.[Note: This level is situated between 'H'
               and 'HH'.]                                                      Deprecation Comment: The
               code 'H&gt;' is being deprecated in order to align with the use of the code 'HU' for &quot;Very
               high&quot; in V2 Table 0078 &quot;Interpretation Codes&quot;.                        
                [Note: The use of code 'H&gt;' is non-preferred, as this code is deprecated and on track
               to be retired; use code 'HU' instead."/>
          </concept>
        </concept>
        <concept>
          <code value="L"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Low"/>
          <definition value="The result for a quantitative observation is below the lower limit of the reference range
             (as defined for the respective test procedure).                          Synonym: Below
             low normal"/>
          <concept>
            <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-deprecated">
              <valueBoolean value="true"/>
            </extension>
            <modifierExtension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-subsumes">
              <valueCode value="LL"/>
            </modifierExtension>
            <code value="L&lt;"/>
            <abstract value="false"/>
            <display value="Significantly low"/>
            <definition value="A test result that is significantly lower than the reference (normal) or therapeutic interval,
               but has not reached the critically low value and might need special attention, as defined
               by the laboratory or the clinician.[Note: This level is situated between 'L' and 'LL'.]
                                                                    Deprecation Comment: The code 'L&lt;'
               is being deprecated in order to align with the use of the code 'LU' for &quot;Very low&quot;
               in V2 Table 0078 &quot;Interpretation Codes&quot;.                          [Note: The
               use of code 'L&lt;' is non-preferred, as this code is deprecated and on track to be retired;
               use code 'LU' instead."/>
          </concept>
        </concept>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="N"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Normal"/>
        <definition value="The result or observation value is within the reference range or expected norm (as defined
           for the respective test procedure).                          [Note: Applies to numeric
           or non-numeric results.]"/>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <modifierExtension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-subsumes">
        <valueCode value="IE"/>
      </modifierExtension>
      <code value="_ObservationInterpretationSusceptibility"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="ObservationInterpretationSusceptibility"/>
      <definition value="Interpretations of anti-microbial susceptibility testing results (microbiology). At most
         one allowed."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="I"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Intermediate"/>
        <definition value="Bacterial strain inhibited in vitro by a concentration of an antimicrobial agent that
           is associated with uncertain therapeutic effect. Reference: CLSI (http://www.clsi.org/Content/Naviga
          tionMenu/Resources/HarmonizedTerminologyDatabase/Harmonized_Terminolo.htm) Projects: ISO
           20776-1, ISO 20776-2                          [Note 1: Bacterial strains are categorized
           as intermediate by applying the appropriate breakpoints in a defined phenotypic test system.]
                                    [Note 2: This class of susceptibility implies that an infection
           due to the isolate can be appropriately treated in body sites where the drugs are physiologically
           concentrated or when a high dosage of drug can be used.]                          [Note
           3: This class also indicates a &quot;buffer zone,&quot; to prevent small, uncontrolled,
           technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretations.]              
                      [Note 4: These breakpoints can be altered due to changes in circumstances (e.g.,
           changes in commonly used drug dosages, emergence of new resistance mechanisms).]"/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-deprecated">
          <valueBoolean value="true"/>
        </extension>
        <code value="MS"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="moderately susceptible"/>
        <definition value="The patient is considered as carrier based on the testing results. A carrier is an individual
           who carries an altered form of a gene which can lead to having a child or offspring in
           future generations with a genetic disorder.                                          
                                                     Deprecation Comment:                       
                This antimicrobial susceptibility test interpretation concept is recommended by OO
           to be deprecated as it is no longer recommended for use in susceptibility testing by CLSI
           (reference CLSI document M100-S22; Vol. 32 No.3; CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial
           Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. Jan 2012)."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="NS"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Non-susceptible"/>
        <definition value="A category used for isolates for which only a susceptible interpretive criterion has been
           designated because of the absence or rare occurrence of resistant strains. Isolates that
           have MICs above or zone diameters below the value indicated for the susceptible breakpoint
           should be reported as non-susceptible.                          NOTE 1: An isolate that
           is interpreted as non-susceptible does not necessarily mean that the isolate has a resistance
           mechanism. It is possible that isolates with MICs above the susceptible breakpoint that
           lack resistance mechanisms may be encountered within the wild-type distribution subsequent
           to the time the susceptible-only breakpoint is set.                           NOTE 2:
           For strains yielding results in the &quot;nonsusceptible&quot; category, organism identification
           and antimicrobial susceptibility test results should be confirmed.                   
                 Synonym: decreased susceptibility."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="R"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Resistant"/>
        <definition value="Bacterial strain inhibited in vitro by a concentration of an antimicrobial agent that
           is associated with a high likelihood of therapeutic failure. Reference: CLSI (http://www.clsi.org/Co
          ntent/NavigationMenu/Resources/HarmonizedTerminologyDatabase/Harmonized_Terminolo.htm)
             Projects: ISO 20776-1, ISO 20776-2                          [Note 1: Bacterial strains
           are categorized as resistant by applying the appropriate breakpoints in a defined phenotypic
           test system.]                          [Note 2: This breakpoint can be altered due to
           changes in circumstances (e.g., changes in commonly used drug dosages, emergence of new
           resistance mechanisms).]"/>
        <concept>
          <code value="SYN-R"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Synergy - resistant"/>
          <definition value="A category for isolates where the bacteria (e.g. enterococci) are not susceptible in vitro
             to a combination therapy (e.g., high-level aminoglycoside and cell wall active agent).
              This is predictive that this combination therapy will not be effective.             
                                                      Usage Note: Since the use of penicillin or ampicillin
             alone often results in treatment failure of serious enterococcal or other bacterial infections,
             combination therapy is usually indicated to enhance bactericidal activity. The synergy
             between a cell wall active agent (such as penicillin, ampicillin, or vancomycin) and an
             aminoglycoside (such as gentamicin, kanamycin or streptomycin) is best predicted by screening
             for high-level bacterial resistance to the aminoglycoside.                           
                                       Open Issue: The print name of the code is very general and the
             description is very specific to a pair of classes of agents, which may lead to confusion
             of these concepts in the future should other synergies be found."/>
        </concept>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="S"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Susceptible"/>
        <definition value="Bacterial strain inhibited by in vitro concentration of an antimicrobial agent that is
           associated with a high likelihood of therapeutic success. Reference: CLSI (http://www.clsi.org/Conte
          nt/NavigationMenu/Resources/HarmonizedTerminologyDatabase/Harmonized_Terminolo.htm) Synonym
           (earlier term): Sensitive Projects: ISO 20776-1, ISO 20776-2                         
           [Note 1: Bacterial strains are categorized as susceptible by applying the appropriate
           breakpoints in a defined phenotypic system.]                          [Note 2: This breakpoint
           can be altered due to changes in circumstances (e.g., changes in commonly used drug dosages,
           emergence of new resistance mechanisms).]"/>
        <concept>
          <code value="SDD"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Susceptible-dose dependent"/>
          <definition value="A category that includes isolates with antimicrobial agent minimum inhibitory concentrations
             (MICs) that approach usually attainable blood and tissue levels and for which response
             rates may be lower than for susceptible isolates.                          Reference:
             CLSI document M44-A2 2009 &quot;Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing
             of yeasts; approved guideline - second edition&quot; - page 2."/>
        </concept>
        <concept>
          <code value="SYN-S"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Synergy - susceptible"/>
          <definition value="A category for isolates where the bacteria (e.g. enterococci) are susceptible in vitro
             to a combination therapy (e.g., high-level aminoglycoside and cell wall active agent).
              This is predictive that this combination therapy will be effective.                 
                                                  Usage Note: Since the use of penicillin or ampicillin
             alone often results in treatment failure of serious enterococcal or other bacterial infections,
             combination therapy is usually indicated to enhance bactericidal activity. The synergy
             between a cell wall active agent (such as penicillin, ampicillin, or vancomycin) and an
             aminoglycoside (such as gentamicin, kanamycin or streptomycin) is best predicted by screening
             for high-level bacterial resistance to the aminoglycoside.                           
                                       Open Issue: The print name of the code is very general and the
             description is very specific to a pair of classes of agents, which may lead to confusion
             of these concepts in the future should other synergies be found."/>
        </concept>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <extension url="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/valueset-deprecated">
          <valueBoolean value="true"/>
        </extension>
        <code value="VS"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="very susceptible"/>
        <definition value="The patient is considered as carrier based on the testing results. A carrier is an individual
           who carries an altered form of a gene which can lead to having a child or offspring in
           future generations with a genetic disorder.                                          
                                                     Deprecation Comment:                       
                This antimicrobial susceptibility test interpretation concept is recommended by OO
           to be deprecated as it is no longer recommended for use in susceptibility testing by CLSI
           (reference CLSI document M100-S22; Vol. 32 No.3; CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial
           Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. Jan 2012)."/>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <code value="EX"/>
      <abstract value="false"/>
      <display value="outside threshold"/>
      <definition value="The observation/test result is interpreted as being outside the inclusion range for a
         particular protocol within which the result is being reported.                       
            Example: A positive result on a Hepatitis screening test.                         
           Open Issue: EX, HX, LX: These three concepts do not seem to meet a clear need in the
         vocabulary, and their use in observation interpretation appears likely to be covered by
         other existing concepts (e.g., A, H, L).  The only apparent significant difference is
         their reference to use in protocols for exclusion of study subjects. These concepts/codes
         were proposed by RCRIM for use in the CTLaboratory message.  They were submitted and approved
         in the November 2005 Harmonization cycle in proposal &quot;030103C_VOCAB_RCRIM_l_quade_RCRIM
         Obs Interp_20051028154455&quot;.  However, this proposal was not fully implemented in
         the vocabulary.  The proposal recommended creation of the x_ClinicalResearchExclusion
         domain in ObservationInterpretation with a value set including those three concepts/codes,
         but there is no subdomain of that name or equivalent with a binding to either of the value
         sets that contain these concepts/codes. Members of the OO WG have recently attempted to
         contact members of RCRIM regarding these concepts, both by email and at the recent WGM
         in Atlanta, without response.  It is felt by OO that the best course of action to take
         at this time is to add this comprehensive Open Issue rather than deprecate these three
         concepts at this time, until further discussion is held."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="HX"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="above high threshold"/>
        <definition value="The observation/test result is interpreted as being outside the inclusion range for a
           particular protocol within which the result is being reported.                       
              Example: A positive result on a Hepatitis screening test.                         
             Open Issue: EX, HX, LX: These three concepts do not seem to meet a clear need in the
           vocabulary, and their use in observation interpretation appears likely to be covered by
           other existing concepts (e.g., A, H, L).  The only apparent significant difference is
           their reference to use in protocols for exclusion of study subjects.  These concepts/codes
           were proposed by RCRIM for use in the CTLaboratory message.  They were submitted and approved
           in the November 2005 Harmonization cycle in proposal &quot;030103C_VOCAB_RCRIM_l_quade_RCRIM
           Obs Interp_20051028154455&quot;. However, this proposal was not fully implemented in the
           vocabulary.  The proposal recommended creation of the x_ClinicalResearchExclusion domain
           in ObservationInterpretation with a value set including those three concepts/codes, but
           there is no subdomain of that name or equivalent with a binding to either of the value
           sets that contain these concepts/codes.  Members of the OO WG have recently attempted
           to contact members of RCRIM regarding these concepts, both by email and at the recent
           WGM in Atlanta, without response.  It is felt by OO that the best course of action to
           take at this time is to add this comprehensive Open Issue rather than deprecate these
           three concepts at this time, until further discussion is held."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="LX"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="below low threshold"/>
        <definition value="The numeric observation/test result is interpreted as being below the low threshold value
           for a particular protocol within which the result is being reported.                 
                   Example: A Total White Blood Cell Count falling below a protocol-defined threshold
           value of 3000/mm^3                            Open Issue: EX, HX, LX: These three concepts
           do not seem to meet a clear need in the vocabulary, and their use in observation interpretation
           appears likely to be covered by other existing concepts (e.g., A, H, L).  The only apparent
           significant difference is their reference to use in protocols for exclusion of study subjects.
            These concepts/codes were proposed by RCRIM for use in the CTLaboratory message.  They
           were submitted and approved in the November 2005 Harmonization cycle in proposal &quot;030103C_VOCAB
          _RCRIM_l_quade_RCRIM Obs Interp_20051028154455&quot;.  However, this proposal was not fully
           implemented in the vocabulary.  The proposal recommended creation of the x_ClinicalResearchExclusion
           domain in ObservationInterpretation with a value set including those three concepts/codes,
           but there is no subdomain of that name or equivalent with a binding to either of the value
           sets that contain these concepts/codes.  Members of the OO WG have recently attempted
           to contact members of RCRIM regarding these concepts, both by email and at the recent
           WGM in Atlanta, without response.  It is felt by OO that the best course of action to
           take at this time is to add this comprehensive Open Issue rather than deprecate these
           three concepts at this time, until further discussion is held."/>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <code value="ObservationInterpretationDetection"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="ObservationInterpretationDetection"/>
      <definition value="Interpretations of the presence or absence of a component / analyte or organism in a test
         or of a sign in a clinical observation. In keeping with laboratory data processing practice,
         these concepts provide a categorical interpretation of the &quot;meaning&quot; of the
         quantitative value for the same observation."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="IND"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Indeterminate"/>
        <definition value="The specified component / analyte, organism or clinical sign could neither be declared
           positive / negative or detected / not detected by the performed test or procedure."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="NEG"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Negative"/>
        <definition value="An absence finding of the specified component / analyte, organism or clinical sign based
           on the established threshold of the performed test or procedure.                     
               [Note: Negative does not necessarily imply the complete absence of the specified item.]"/>
        <concept>
          <code value="ND"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Not detected"/>
          <definition value="The presence of the specified component / analyte, organism or clinical sign could not
             be determined within the limit of detection of the performed test or procedure."/>
        </concept>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="POS"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Positive"/>
        <definition value="A presence finding of the specified component / analyte, organism or clinical sign based
           on the established threshold of the performed test or procedure."/>
        <concept>
          <code value="DET"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Detected"/>
          <definition value="The measurement of the specified component / analyte, organism or clinical sign above
             the limit of detection of the performed test or procedure."/>
        </concept>
      </concept>
    </concept>
    <concept>
      <code value="ReactivityObservationInterpretation"/>
      <abstract value="true"/>
      <display value="ReactivityObservationInterpretation"/>
      <definition value="Interpretations of the presence and level of reactivity of the specified component / analyte
         with the reagent in the performed laboratory test."/>
      <concept>
        <code value="NR"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Non-reactive"/>
        <definition value="An absence finding used to indicate that the specified component / analyte did not react
           measurably with the reagent."/>
      </concept>
      <concept>
        <code value="RR"/>
        <abstract value="false"/>
        <display value="Reactive"/>
        <definition value="A presence finding used to indicate that the specified component / analyte reacted with
           the reagent above the reliably measurable limit of the performed test."/>
        <concept>
          <code value="WR"/>
          <abstract value="false"/>
          <display value="Weakly reactive"/>
          <definition value="A weighted presence finding used to indicate that the specified component / analyte reacted
             with the reagent, but below the reliably measurable limit of the performed test."/>
        </concept>
      </concept>
    </concept>
  </define>
</ValueSet>

Usage note: every effort has been made to ensure that the examples are correct and useful, but they are not a normative part of the specification.